Uber has issued a sternly worded letter toAnthony Levandowski, the engineer at the center of a lawsuit alleging stealing of trade secret from Google parent Alphabets self-driving engineering force Waymo. The gist? Comply with the courts ordersor risk being terminated.
Levandowski isthe former technologylead forGoogles autonomous vehicle force and co-founder of self-driving truck startup Otto, which Uber acquired for $680 million last-place summertime. He is also accused of committing downloading tens of thousands ofconfidential documentsrelated to Googles proprietary LiDAR design before leaving the company and founding Otto.
That is at the center ofWaymos occurrence, which was filed in February and accuses Uber of embezzling itstrade secrets and impinging on patents related to its self-driving vehicle curriculum. The suitis going to testand theres the possibility of a criminal case being opened up as well.
But in the meantime, Waymo has been alleged that breakthrough in the matter has been held up by Levandowski refusing to answer questions related to the alleged stealing of proprietary data. Levandowski has persistently invoked the Fifth Amendmentin the case, quoting possibilities for criminal action that could to be translated into self-incrimination.
Last week Judge William Alsup orderedthat Uber exercise the full extent of[ its] corporate, hire, contractual, and other the authorities concerned forceLevandowski to comeback anydownloaded fabrics to Waymo.
Following that, Uber on May 15 senta letter addressed to Levandowski yielding him a option between revoke[ ing] ever having made any downloaded fabrics from Google or hand over any fabrics he might have taken from Google. If he failed to comply, he would risk termination of his employment.
[ A] s you know, your hire at Uber is on an at-will basis. Recognize A. Levandowski Employment Agreement, Aug. 17, 2016 5( a)( August 17, 2016 Employment Agreement ). As a condition of your hire at Uber, you must comply with all of the requirements set forth in this letter. If you do not agree to comply with all of the requirements set forth herein, or if you fail to comply in a material politenes, then Uber will take adverse hire activity against you, which may include termination of your employment and such termination would be for Cause.
If you comply with these requirements, your hire at Uber will continue on an at- will basis. For the avoidance of fear, Uber holds the sole title to determine whether you are in compliance with the requirements set forth above.
In his own filing, Levandowskis attorneys “re saying that” the Courtrooms require to Uber and Ubers own menaces would violate his constitutional title to eschew self-incrimination.
Anything short of fuelling Mr. Levandowski to get him to forfeit his Fifth Amendment rights and attorney-client advantages would give Uber at risk of defiance, because it would fail to measure up to the Courtrooms dominate that Uber exercise every lawful capability it has over Mr. Levandowski, it says.